PHBV / MINERALIZATION
Loading model

Endpoint-audited F-pre research model · v3.0.0

Make the estimate.
Keep the evidence visible.

Explore literature-derived PHBV CO2 mineralization with an exact browser-native random forest, a kinetic reference, and two deliberately visible uncertainty boundaries.

1,031endpoint-audited observations
11independent source studies
17.35exact RF curve-held-out MAE
26.06exact RF new-study MAE
RESEARCH USE

The exact RF did not outperform the global time-only baseline in the cross-study task. Predictions for an unobserved study remain insufficiently reliable for quantitative decisions.

Input profile

Describe the recorded scenario

Ranges describe marginal coverage in the training corpus, not joint applicability.

The exact browser model is loading.

Read before use

What the interface can—and cannot—tell you

Why the cross-study interval is wide

The 69.32-point radius is derived from the maximum absolute error over all curves and times in each held-out study. It is an intentionally conservative stress diagnostic, not prospective conformal coverage.

Why a simple kinetic line is shown

The global reference, B(t)=64.63(1-exp(-0.03504t)), achieved a new-study MAE of 24.87 percentage points versus 26.06 for the exact F-pre RF. The RF therefore has no demonstrated transport advantage.

Why two curated fields are absent

The public model uses only the F-pre set expected to be available before testing. Source-curated degradation-mechanism and PHA-degrading-microbe labels were excluded because their status is not reliably known at prediction time.

What “inside the range” means

Marginal checks only detect obvious numeric extrapolation and unseen categories. They cannot establish that the full formulation–environment–protocol combination is represented.

Privacy and exactness

Preprocessing and all 300 trees execute locally in your browser. Inputs are not sent to an inference API. Cross-language release tests compare browser predictions with the frozen scikit-learn pipeline to 1e-10.